Medical Book

Search

Showing results for: Array

    Medical Book

    1.11

    1.11

    Minnesota Code 1-1-1: major Q wave (Q/R ≥ 1/3, Q ≥ 0.03 s), sign of previous myocardial infarction.

    Code 1.11 — Minnesota Code 1-1-1: major Q/QS wave. A Q wave is an initial negative deflection of the QRS complex. Code 1-1-1 is assigned when the Q wave is both deep (Q/R amplitude ratio ≥ 1/3) and wide (duration ≥ 0.03 s) in the leads of one anatomical region. It is one of the "major" Q-wave codes and is the classic electrocardiographic sign of a previous (old) myocardial infarction in that region.

    Minnesota Code 1Q/QS patternPrevious myocardial infarction
    CriterionQ/R ≥ 1/3 and Q ≥ 0.03 s
    CategoryMajor Q wave
    Q amplitude≥ 0.1 mV (1 mm)
    Novacode equivalentNC-5.1 (Q-wave MI)

    Why Q waves appear

    Normally the ventricular septum is activated first, from left to right, producing a small and narrow "septal" q wave in leads I, aVL and V5–V6. When part of the ventricular wall dies after a myocardial infarction, the scar no longer generates electrical forces. An electrode facing the scar then "looks through" it at the opposite wall and records a deep, wide negative wave — a pathological Q wave — or even a completely negative QS complex.

    Normal small septal q wave compared with a major Q wave: Q at least one third of the R wave and at least 0.03 seconds wide Normal small septal q < 0.03 s Code 1-1-1 Q/R ≥ 1/3, Q ≥ 0.03 s
    Figure 1. Left: normal QRS with a small septal q. Right: major Q wave (Minnesota 1-1-1) — deep (Q/R ≥ 1/3) and wide (≥ 0.03 s), typical of a scar after myocardial infarction.

    Criteria by lead group

    RegionLeads examinedCode 1-1-1 criterion
    AnterolateralI, aVL, V6Q/R ≥ 1/3 and Q duration ≥ 0.03 s in lead I or V6
    Posterior (inferior)II, III, aVFQ/R ≥ 1/3 and Q duration ≥ 0.03 s in lead II
    AnteriorV1–V5Q/R ≥ 1/3 and Q duration ≥ 0.03 s in any of V2–V5
    Q must be at least 0.1 mV (1 mm) deep. Q codes are not assigned in the presence of WPW pattern (6-4-1), artificial pacemaker (6-8), complete AV block, ventricular fibrillation/asystole or sustained supraventricular tachycardia ≥ 140/min.

    Clinical significance

    • A major Q wave in two contiguous leads of one region is a strong marker of prior myocardial infarction, often with loss of contracting muscle in that wall.
    • In population studies such Q waves are frequently found in people who never had symptoms — unrecognised ("silent") infarction, which carries a prognosis similar to recognised infarction.
    • Major Q waves are associated with increased risk of heart failure, arrhythmias and cardiovascular death.

    Possible causes other than infarction

    • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (deep narrow septal Q waves)
    • Left bundle branch block, left ventricular hypertrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy
    • Infiltrative diseases (amyloidosis, sarcoidosis), myocarditis
    • Pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, chest deformities
    • Electrode misplacement — the most common technical cause

    Recommended next steps

    • Compare with previous ECGs
    • Echocardiography to look for regional wall-motion abnormality or scar
    • Assessment of risk factors (blood pressure, lipids, glucose, smoking)
    • Depending on findings: stress testing, cardiac MRI or coronary imaging
    Seek urgent care

    if a new Q wave appears together with chest pain, breathlessness, sweating or fainting — this may be an evolving myocardial infarction and requires emergency evaluation.

    References

    1. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Zhang ZM. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2010. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-778-3
    2. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40(3):237–269. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462
    3. Rautaharju PM, Park LP, Chaitman BR, Rautaharju F, Zhang ZM. The Novacode criteria for classification of ECG abnormalities and their clinically significant progression and regression. J Electrocardiol. 1998;31(3):157–187.

    This article is for general information and does not replace a consultation with a doctor. ECG findings must be interpreted by a physician together with symptoms and other tests.

    Published on 14 May 2019