Novacode 3.2: complete right bundle branch block — QRS ≥ 120 ms, rSR′ in V1–V2, wide S in I and V6; when it is benign and when it needs evaluation.
Code 3.21 (Novacode NC-3.2) — complete right bundle branch block (RBBB). In RBBB the impulse does not pass down the right bundle branch. The left ventricle is activated normally and the right ventricle is activated late, through the muscle. This produces a wide QRS (≥ 120 ms) with a characteristic rSR′ ("M") pattern in V1–V2 and a broad S wave in leads I and V6. In the Minnesota Code the same finding is coded 7-2-1.
Right ventricular pressure or volume overload: pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, atrial septal defect
Degenerative disease of the conduction system; after heart surgery or catheter procedures
Brugada pattern can resemble RBBB (coved ST elevation in V1–V2) and needs specialist assessment
Clinical significance
Isolated RBBB in a person without symptoms and with a normal heart usually has a good prognosis. Its importance increases when it is new, when it occurs together with left anterior or posterior fascicular block (bifascicular block) or a long PR interval, or when there are signs of heart disease. A new RBBB with sudden breathlessness or chest pain may indicate acute pulmonary embolism or myocardial infarction.
Usually benign
Long-standing, isolated RBBB, no symptoms, normal echocardiogram.
Needs evaluation
New RBBB, combination with fascicular block or AV block, fainting, breathlessness, family history of sudden death.
Seek urgent care
if RBBB appears together with chest pain, sudden breathlessness, fainting or a very slow pulse.
References
Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e235–e240. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191095
Rautaharju PM, Park LP, Chaitman BR, Rautaharju F, Zhang ZM. The Novacode criteria for classification of ECG abnormalities and their clinically significant progression and regression. J Electrocardiol. 1998;31(3):157–187.
Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Zhang ZM. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2010. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-778-3
This article is for general information and does not replace a consultation with a doctor. ECG findings must be interpreted by a physician together with symptoms and other tests.