Minnesota Code 4-4: J-point depression ≥ 1 mm with up-sloping ST — usually less specific, but watch for the de Winter pattern.
Code 4.4 — Minnesota Code 4-4: J-point depression with up-sloping ST segment. The J point is depressed by 1.0 mm or more, but the ST segment then rises (up-sloping) or is U-shaped and returns towards the baseline. This "junctional" depression is common during a fast heart rate and is generally considered less specific for ischaemia than horizontal or down-sloping depression. The Minnesota Code counts it as a minor abnormality.
Minnesota Code 4Up-sloping STMinor ST change
ST-J depression≥ 1.0 mm
ST shapeup-sloping or U-shaped
Classminor abnormality
Often withtachycardia
Figure 1. Left: horizontal ST depression (code 4-1, more specific for ischaemia). Right: J-point depression ≥ 1 mm with up-sloping ST returning to baseline (Minnesota 4-4).
Possible causes
Sinus tachycardia, exercise, fever, anxiety — the atrial repolarisation wave (Ta) pulls down the J point
Myocardial ischaemia, especially if the up-slope is slow and the depression persists 80 ms after J
Hypertrophy, medicines, electrolyte disorders
Clinical significance
Rapidly up-sloping ST depression at rest is usually of limited significance. A slowly up-sloping depression, especially ≥ 1.5–2 mm measured 80 ms after the J point during an exercise test, may nevertheless indicate ischaemia. A particular pattern that requires urgent attention is the de Winter pattern: up-sloping ST depression in V1–V6 with tall, symmetrical T waves, which can signal acute occlusion of the left anterior descending artery.
What to do
Without symptoms, it is usually enough to discuss the ECG at a scheduled visit. The doctor will consider your heart rate at the time of recording and compare it with earlier ECGs.
Call emergency services
if you have chest pain, pressure, breathlessness or cold sweat — up-sloping ST depression with tall T waves can accompany an acute heart attack.
References
Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Zhang ZM. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2010. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-778-3
de Winter RJ, Verouden NJW, Wellens HJJ, Wilde AAM. A new ECG sign of proximal LAD occlusion. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(19):2071–2073. doi:10.1056/NEJMc0804737
Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e241–e250. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191096
This article is for general information and does not replace a consultation with a doctor. ECG findings must be interpreted by a physician together with symptoms and other tests.