Medical Book

Search

Showing results for: Array

    Medical Book

    7.21

    7.21

    Minnesota Code 7-2-1: complete right bundle branch block — criteria, related codes and when it matters.

    Code 7.21 — Minnesota Code 7-2-1: complete right bundle branch block. The Minnesota Code assigns 7-2-1 when the QRS duration is 0.12 s (120 ms) or more in a majority of beats in the limb leads and the right precordial leads (V1 or V2) show an R′ wave (rsR′, rSR′ or a broad R); a broad terminal S wave in I and V6 usually accompanies it. The right ventricle is activated late, after the left. Unlike LBBB, RBBB does not prevent the coding of Q waves for myocardial infarction.

    Minnesota Code 7Right bundle branch blockWide QRS
    QRS duration≥ 120 ms
    V1 / V2R′ (rsR′, rSR′)
    I, V6broad terminal S
    NovacodeNC-3.2 (code 3.21)
    Normal rS pattern in V1 compared with complete right bundle branch block with rSR prime pattern Normal V1 QRS ≈ 90 ms QRS 90 ms Code 7-2-1 rSR′, QRS ≥ 120 ms QRS 135 ms
    Figure 1. Left: normal V1 (rS). Right: complete RBBB in V1 — QRS ≥ 120 ms with rSR′ pattern and secondary T inversion (Minnesota 7-2-1).

    Related Minnesota codes

    CodeMeaning
    7-2-1Complete RBBB
    7-2-2Intermittent RBBB
    7-3Incomplete RBBB (QRS < 120 ms with R′ in V1/V2)
    7-8RBBB combined with left anterior fascicular block (bifascicular block)

    Clinical significance

    Isolated RBBB is found in a few percent of older adults and often has no clinical consequences. It becomes more significant when it is new, when it is combined with left anterior or posterior fascicular block or a prolonged PR interval, or when heart or lung disease is present. A new RBBB with sudden breathlessness may indicate pulmonary embolism; with chest pain, it may indicate an acute infarction.

    Seek emergency care

    if RBBB appears together with chest pain, sudden breathlessness, fainting or a very slow pulse.

    References

    1. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Zhang ZM. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2010. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-778-3
    2. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e235–e240. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191095
    3. Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay. Circulation. 2019;140(8):e382–e482. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628

    This article is for general information and does not replace a consultation with a doctor. ECG findings must be interpreted by a physician together with symptoms and other tests.

    Published on 14 May 2019