Medical Book

Search

Showing results for: Array

    Medical Book

    7.4

    7.4

    Minnesota Code 7-4: non-specific intraventricular block with QRS ≥ 120 ms — causes and prognosis.

    Code 7.4 — Minnesota Code 7-4: non-specific intraventricular block. The QRS duration is 0.12 s (120 ms) or more in a majority of beats, but the shape of the complex does not meet the criteria for complete left or right bundle branch block. The delay is spread throughout the ventricular muscle or the distal conduction system. Like LBBB, this code suppresses Q-wave, ST and T coding in the Minnesota system. The Novacode counterpart is NC-3.3 (code 3.31).

    Minnesota Code 7Intraventricular blockWide QRS
    QRS duration≥ 120 ms
    Morphologyneither LBBB nor RBBB
    Suppressescodes 1, 4, 5
    NovacodeNC-3.3 (code 3.31)
    Normal narrow QRS compared with a widened non-specific QRS of intraventricular block Normal QRS ≈ 90 ms QRS 90 ms Code 7-4 QRS ≥ 120 ms QRS 135 ms
    Figure 1. Left: normal QRS. Right: non-specific intraventricular block — QRS ≥ 120 ms without the typical shape of LBBB or RBBB (Minnesota 7-4).

    Causes

    • Dilated or ischaemic cardiomyopathy, scar after myocardial infarction
    • Severe left ventricular hypertrophy
    • Hyperkalaemia — an emergency when QRS widens quickly
    • Sodium-channel-blocking drugs (class IC antiarrhythmics, tricyclic antidepressants) and overdoses
    • Infiltrative heart disease, hypothermia

    Clinical significance

    A wide QRS without bundle branch block shape often reflects diffuse damage of the ventricular muscle. In population studies and in patients with heart disease, non-specific intraventricular conduction delay has been associated with a higher risk of heart failure and cardiovascular death. Evaluation includes echocardiography, a review of medications and blood electrolytes.

    Seek emergency care

    if QRS widening is new and accompanied by weakness, palpitations, fainting or chest pain, or if it occurs with kidney failure, potassium-raising drugs or possible overdose.

    References

    1. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Zhang ZM. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2010. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-778-3
    2. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e235–e240. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191095

    This article is for general information and does not replace a consultation with a doctor. ECG findings must be interpreted by a physician together with symptoms and other tests.

    Published on 14 May 2019